Oxford Local Plan 2036: Proposed Submission Draft Consultation

Chapter 4- Making wise use of our resources and securing a good quality local environment

4. Making wise use of our resources and securing a good quality local environment

It is important to think about how we can make best use of our natural resources
such as land, water and energy because we have a limited supply and our choices
can have significant environmental impacts. As Oxford’s population increases,
there will be increasing pressure on these resources. It is therefore important to
plan developments to minimise their use of resources.

Oxford is a small city with a tight urban boundary. This means that there is limited
land available for development. We need to consider how to make best use of the
land we do have to provide the homes and jobs we need.

We need to ensure that buildings and people can adapt to the changing climate
already evident in the form of more extreme weather conditions being experienced
in the city and beyond. The impacts of climate change can result in flooding,
drought and overheating. These impacts affect the city’s residents, have financial
implications and can result in the decline of some plant and animal species. New
development must be designed to adapt to these risks with the introduction of
specific design measures and green infrastructure features that can help to mitigate
some of these risks and where possible address damage caused by previous

i. Sustainable design and construction

Carbon reduction

4.1 The City Council aims to tackle the causes of climate change by ensuring
developments use less energy and assess the opportunities for using
renewable energy technologies. The City Council is committed to exceed
an 80 % reduction in total carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions produced in
the City by 2050 from 1990 levels to limit climate change. Thus, it is
crucial that planning policy limits carbon dioxide emissions from new
development wherever possible and supports sensitive energy efficiency
improvements to existing buildings. In addition, policy seeks to ensure that
the gap between the designed and as built energy performance of new
buildings is as little as possible.

4.2 When a building is constructed, the accessibility of its location, its density
and mix of uses, its detailed design, its orientation, and the mechanical
services and materials chosen can all have a major impact on its energy
efficiency. The City Council will require all schemes to consider sustainable
development principles from the start of the design process and include
these in their Design and Access Statement and/or Sustainability Statement.


4.3 BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment
Method) is a tool for assessing the environmental sustainability of a
development. The BREEAM standards will be applied to non-residential
developments including conversions, extensions and changes of use).
The Home Quality Mark (2015) is another way of demonstrating the
standard of a new residential dwelling, which includes measures for low
CO2, sustainable materials, good air quality and natural daylight. The City
Council will encourage schemes to use the Home Quality Mark. The use of
Passivhaus standard is also encouraged in demonstrating energy efficient


4.4 The local plan supports the monitoring of schemes (threshold 5+ dwellings
or 1000m2) in the form of post construction testing in order to improve
our understanding of these issues and also to ensure that performance
standards for low carbon buildings are linked to as-built performance.
Sustainable retrofi tting of existing buildings

4.5 In Oxford, existing domestic buildings contributed 31%14 of the city’s
carbon emissions in 2015. Therefore, retrofitting the existing building
stock presents an opportunity to help meet the carbon reduction targets
for the city. The Local Plan supports sustainable retrofitting measures for
existing buildings. Such measures can range from low cost measures such
as loft and cavity wall insulation to complete refurbishment of buildings
and their systems. The low energy refurbishment of homes could help
reduce fuel bills and create a better environment for occupiers, which will
be particularly important for the most vulnerable groups, including those
living in fuel poverty. The City Council has produced Technical Advice Notes
on External Wall Insulation and the Heritage Energy Efficiency Toolkit to
provide information to developers as to how to maximise the opportunities
for retrofitting buildings.

4.6 Oxford has a wealth of Listed Buildings and traditional buildings in
Conservation Areas. These buildings present a considerable challenge
when considering how on-site renewables can be incorporated and carbon
emissions reduced. The Council supports all measures to retrofit listed and
historical buildings in a sensitive manner and has produced the Heritage
Energy Efficiency Tool (HEET). This guidance helps assess energy efficiency
improvements for historic buildings.

Water Efficiency

4.7 An optional water efficiency standard was introduced in 2015 following
the Housing Standards Review. This higher option standard for new
development of 110 litres per person per day as set out in Building
Regulations Part G2 can be applied where there is an evidence based need
that the area is water stressed. The area of South East England in which
Thames Water operates and Oxford is located, has been classified by the
Environment Agency as being under serious water stress. Thus to ensure
adequate water supply during the plan period new development will be
expected to meet higher water efficiency standards as set out in Policy RE1.
For non-residential development the Local Plan sets a minimum standard
that must be achieved within the BREEAM assessment. Opportunities to
harvest grey water should be encouraged and developed, where possible,
in new development.

Policy RE1: Sustainable design and construction

Planning permission will only be granted where it can be demonstrated that the following sustainable design and construction principles have been incorporated, where relevant:

  1. Maximising energy efficiency and the use of low carbon energy;
  2. Conserving water and maximising water efficiency;
  3. Using recycled and recyclable materials and sourcing them responsibly;
  4. Minimising waste and maximising recycling during construction and operation;
  5. Minimising flood risk including flood resilient construction;
  6. Being flexible and adaptable to future occupier needs; and
  7. Incorporating measures to enhance biodiversity value.

Carbon reduction in new-build residential developments (other than householder applications):

Planning permission will only be granted for new build residential and student accommodation developments (or 25 student rooms or more) which achieve at least a 40% reduction in the carbon emissions from a code compliant base case[1]. This reduction is to be secured through on-site renewable energy and other low carbon technologies (this would be broadly equivalent to 25% of all energy used) and/or energy efficiency measures. The requirement will increase from 2026 to at least 50% reduction in carbon emissions.  After 31 March 2030 planning permission will only be granted for residential and student accommodation (25 or more non self-contained student rooms) development that is Zero Carbon.


An Energy Statement will be submitted that will include details as to how the policy will be complied with and monitored once installed. 

Carbon reduction in new-build non-residential schemes over 1,000m2:

Planning permission will only be granted for non-residential development proposals that meet the BREEAM excellent standard (or recognised equivalent assessment methodology).  In addition to meeting BREEAM excellent (or recognised equivalent assessment methodology)

Planning permission will only be granted for development proposals over 1000sqm which achieve at least a 40% reduction in the carbon emissions compared with a code compliant base case. This reduction is to be secured through   on-site renewable and other low carbon technologies and/or energy efficiency measures. The requirement will increase from 2026 to at least 50% reduction in carbon emissions.   

The City Council will encourage the development of city wide heat networks. 

If a heat network exists in close proximity to a scheme it is expected to connect to it and this will count towards the development’s carbon reduction requirements.  Evidence will be required to demonstrate why connection to the network is not possible.

To ensure that the Council can monitor the effectiveness of renewable and low carbon technologies, non- residential,  C2, and  C4  and Sui Generis   developments will be required to install appropriate energy metering and  monitoring equipment and a Display Energy Certificate (DEC)  The DEC would be secured by planning condition.  DEC assessments must be made available to the Council for the three years after occupation and a DEC rating of A will be expected by the end of the three year period.  C3 developments will be required to install appropriate energy metering (smart meters).

Water efficiency – residential development:

Proposals for new residential development are to meet the higher water efficiency standard within Building Regulations Part G2 of water consumption target of 110 litres per person per day.

Water efficiency – non-residential development:

Proposals for non-residential development are to meet the minimum standard of four credits under the BREEAM assessment.


[1] Code compliant base case is the amount of reduction in carbon emissions (from regulated energy) beyond Part L of the 2013 Building Regulations or equivalent future legislation.  The current code compliant base case means that the developer has to demonstrate 19% less carbon emissions than Part L of the 2013 Building Regulations.



There are questions you can answer here, but you must either register or log in first.

ii. Efficient use of land

4.8 The NPPF emphasises that “planning policies and decisions should promote
the effective use of land in meeting the need for homes and other uses,
while safeguarding and improving the environment and ensuring safe and
healthy living conditions”. Oxford’s previously developed land has been
identified in the Brownfield Register, and making the best use of this land
will be encouraged throughout the lifetime of this plan.

4.9 Using scarce resources efficiently is vital to ensuring Oxford’s sustainable
growth and development. Oxford is a small, constrained city with a
growing population. Its total area is approximately 4,600km2 with some
very densely developed urban areas. The river corridors of the Thames and
Cherwell penetrate as extensive green and blue wedges into the heart of
the city. These corridors, together with their flood plains, form much of the
city’s 1,287m2 of Green Belt land.

4.10 Oxford has a good record for re-using previously developed land efficiently.
Some parts of the city, including town and district centres, are densely
populated but nonetheless have capacity to accommodate further
residential development sensitively. This approach should, as it promotes
more sustainable and cohesive communities, have a number of positive
Proposed Submission Document 65
environmental and economic effects as development is concentrated in
areas where it will support existing facilities and services. However, given
that previously developed land can only meet a limited supply of Oxford’s
economic and housing need; there is a need to look at a range of additional
greenfield sites to see if any are suitable to help meet needs. Policy G3 sets
out the policy approach to the release of some greenfield sites which could
be suitable for development, which include Green Belt sites.

4.11 Higher density residential development of 100 dwellings per hectare (dph)
is expected in the city and district centres. However, owing to Oxford’s
historic centre it is acknowledged that this density of development is not
always appropriate.

Policy RE2: Efficient use of land

Planning permission will only be granted where development proposals make efficient use of land. 

Development proposals must make best use of site capacity, in a manner compatible with the site itself, the surrounding area and broader considerations of the needs of Oxford, as well as addressing the following criteria:

  1. the density must be appropriate for the use proposed;
  2. the scale of development, including building heights and massing, should conform to other policies in the plan. It is expected that sites at transportation hubs and within the city and district centres in particular will be capable of accommodating development at an increased scale and density, although this will also be encouraged in all other appropriate locations where the impact of so doing is shown to be acceptable;
  3. opportunities for developing at the maximum appropriate density must be fully explored; and
  4. built form and site layout must be appropriate for the capacity of the site.
High-density development (for residential development this will indicatively be taken as 100dph) is expected in the city centre and district centres.


There are questions you can answer here, but you must either register or log in first.

iii. Flooding risk management

4.12 Flooding is the most widespread and frequently occurring of natural
hazards. Both the NPPF and the Flood and Water Management Act
(2010) highlight the need for effective flood risk management strategy
and proactive local plan policies that take account of flood risk and water
supply consideration to ensure the impacts of climate change are fully
considered and mitigated.

4.13 The Oxford City Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1 (November 2017)
concludes that a considerable proportion of Oxford is at some risk of
flooding. Large parts of the built up areas of South and West Oxford and
Lower Wolvercote currently have a 1% or greater annual risk of flooding
(Flood Zone 3). Flood risk in Oxford is predominantly fluvial flooding from
rivers but there is also some flood risk to properties from other sources
including surface water, sewer, groundwater, and flooding from artificial
sources such as reservoirs and canals.

4.14 The NPPF directs development away from areas of high risk from flooding,
and where development within these areas is necessary, makes it safe for
users without increasing the risk of flooding elsewhere (sequential test and
exception tests). A level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) provides
the necessary information for the sequential and exception test to be
applied to support the initial allocation of sites for development.

4.15 The most recent flood events in Oxford were in January 2014, November
2012 and July 2007, each of which resulted in significant disruption to
the city. New development has the potential to interfere with existing
drainage systems, decrease floodplain storage, reduce permeable surface
areas and increase the volume and speed of runoff through a catchment,
ultimately leading to significant changes to river catchment characteristics
and subsequently increase flood risk.

4.16 Proposals for minor household extensions in the flood plain can have a
cumulative impact resulting in increased flood risk as flood storage areas
are lost to development. As such, householder extensions proposed in
either Flood Zone 2 or 3 will require a site specific Flood Risk Assessment
(FRA) to be carried out to assess risk on and off site and mitigation measures
provided to reduce these risks.

4.17 In some areas of Oxford a lot of development already exists in areas at the
highest risk of flooding. This is generally older development that won’t
incorporate features such as SuDs that minimise the impacts of flooding
on the existing properties and that minimise the risk of flooding elsewhere.
The NPPF allows only water-compatible uses and essential infrastructure in
Flood Zone 3b. This prevents reuse of existing buildings in areas at highest
risk of flooding. The approach of the Local Plan policy is to allow very
careful re-development of existing brownfield sites in Flood Zone 3b. This
is to make best use of existing sites in the generally sustainable location of
Oxford and also because new development has the potential to improve
the flood risk situation. The policy sets out conditions for development
in Flood Zone 3b that will ensure the flood risk situation is improved.
Conditions include that the overall built footprint is not increased and that
flood storage is not lost.

The Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme

4.18 The Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme, a partnership project, will help to
convey water away from development infrastructure and will help greatly
in reducing flooding in the most at risk areas. It will bring considerable
benefits to the city in terms of reduced risk of flooding to homes, businesses,
major roads and the railway. The land required for the route of the OFAS
will be safeguarded in perpetuity to enable delivery.

Policy RE 3:  Flood risk management

Planning permission will not be granted for development in Flood zone 3b[1] except where it is for water-compatible uses or essential infrastructure; or where it is on previously developed land and it will represent an improvement for the existing situation in terms of flood risk. All of the following criteria must be met:

  1. it will not lead to a net increase in the built footprint of the existing building; and
  2. it will not lead to a reduction in flood storage (through the use of flood compensation measures); and
  3. it will not lead to an increased risk of flooding elsewhere; and
  4. it will not put any future occupants of the development at risk.

New development will be directed towards areas of low flood risk (Flood Zone 1). In considering proposals elsewhere, the sequential and exception tests will be applied.

Planning applications for development within Flood Zone 2, 3, on sites larger than 1 ha in Flood Zone 1 and, in areas identified as Critical Drainage Areas, must be accompanied by a Site Specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) to align with National Policy.   The FRA must be undertaken in accordance with up to date flood data, national and local guidance on flooding and consider flooding from all sources.  The suitability of developments proposed will be assessed according to the sequential approach and exceptions test as set out in Planning Practice Guidance.

Planning permission will only be granted where the FRA demonstrates that:

  1. the proposed development will not increase flood risk on site or off site; and
  2. safe access and egress in the event of a flood can be provided; and
  3. details of the necessary mitigation measures to be implemented have been provided.

Minor householder extensions may be permitted in Flood Zone 3b, as they have a lower risk of increasing flooding. Proposals for this type of development will be assessed on a case by case basis, taking into account the effect on flood risk on and off site.

Where development sites are within the proposed defended area of the Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme (OFAS), which will provide protection up to the 1 in 100 year (1%) flood scenario, both the defended and undefended data may be taken into consideration. Where properties lie within Flood Zone 3b, defended levels will be taken into account with regards to whether the development is appropriate, on the condition that flood mitigation measures are included up to the undefended level, to provide some protection in the event of a breach.


[1] The functional floodplain is defined as ‘Flood Zone 3b’, and corresponds to the 5% (1 in 20 year) chance of flooding on the EA flood model.



There are questions you can answer here, but you must either register or log in first.

iv. Sustainable drainage systems

4.19 Sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) may include water conservation
(e.g. rainwater collection, grey water recycling, low water use WC’s and
appliances) as well as surface water drainage (e.g. soakaways, porous hard
surfaces, swales, streams and balancing ponds; minimal use of pipes and
culverts). SuDS are designed to mimic the natural drainage arrangements of
a site, and are used to manage surface water flows, providing an important
tool in minimising flood risk. The design of SuDS should be considered at
the earliest possible stages of the planning process so that they can be
incorporated into the design, and the best management practices can be
used. Wherever possible, multiple benefits from SuDS should be sought,
such as the provision of open space, wildlife improvements and water
conservation. If SuDS cannot be provided on site, consideration should be
given to making a contribution to off-site measures.

4.20 The City Council deal with proposals requiring SuDS on minor developments
(up to 9 dwellings, non-residential floor area less than 1000m2, or sites
under 1 hectare in size). Oxfordshire County Council as Lead Local Flood
Authority respond on all applications for all Major Developments (10 or
more dwellings, non- residential floor area of 1000m2 or more, or sites
over 1 hectare in size).

4.21 The Flood and Water Management Act 201020 addresses the threats of
flooding and water scarcity. Under the Flood Risk Regulations 2009, the
Environment Agency is responsible for managing flood risk from main
rivers, the sea and reservoirs. Lead local flood authorities (LLFAs) are
responsible for local sources of flood risk, in particular surface run-off,
groundwater, and ordinary watercourses. LLFAs are statutory consultees
on major development. Local authorities are responsible for ensuring that
requirements for preliminary flood risk assessments are met.

Policy RE4: Sustainable drainage, surface and groundwater Flow

All development proposals will be required to manage surface water through Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) or techniques to limit run-off and reduce the existing rate of run-off on previously developed sites[1]. Surface water runoff should be managed as close to its source as possible, in line with the following drainage hierarchy:

  1. store rainwater for later use; then:
  2. discharge into the ground (infiltration); then:
  3. discharge to a surface water body; then:
  4. discharge to a surface water sewer, highway drain or other drainage system; and finally:
  5. discharge to a combined sewer.

Details of the SuDS shall be submitted as part of a drainage strategy or FRA where required.

Applicants must demonstrate compliance with the SuDS Design and Evaluation Guide SPD/ TAN for minor applications and Oxfordshire County Council guidance for major development.

Surface and groundwater flow and groundwater recharge:

Planning permission will not be granted or development that would have an adverse impact on groundwater flow. The City Council will, where necessary, require effective preventative measures to be taken to ensure that the flow of groundwater will not be obstructed.

Within the surface and groundwater catchment area for the Lye Valley SSSI development will only be permitted if it includes SuDS and where an assessment can demonstrate that there will be no adverse impact on the surface and groundwater flow to the Lye Valley SSSI.

Development on the North Oxford gravel terrace that could influence groundwater flow to the Oxford Meadows Special Area of Conservation (SAC) will only be permitted if it includes SuDS and if a hydrological survey can demonstrate that there will be no significant adverse impact upon the integrity of the SAC.


[1] Oxford City Council SuDS Design and Evaluation Guide– https://www.oxford.gov.uk/info/20000/planning/1282/flood_risk_and_drainage_for_planning



There are questions you can answer here, but you must either register or log in first.

v. Health, well-being, and Health Impact Assessments

4.22 The health and wellbeing of residents is an important priority for the City
Council and Local Plan policies recognise the important link between
the natural and built environment and long-term health and wellbeing
outcomes. A health enabling environment requires high quality urban
design which includes green spaces that facilitate social interaction, creating
environments that encourage healthier food choices and that facilitate
the use of active modes, such as walking and cycling. To ensure that
development promotes and contributes to a healthy living environment,
proposals should consider health outcomes at pre-application stage. For
major development a health impact assessment must be undertaken to
maximise the opportunities for promoting healthy lifestyles within new
development. The fundamental principles of how to carry out good quality
Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) are set out in the Department of Health’s
‘Health Impact Assessment Tools’ (2010).

Policy RE5:  Health, wellbeing,  and Health Impact Assessments

Oxford City Council will seek to promote strong, vibrant and healthy communities and reduce health inequalities.  Proposals will be supported which help to deliver these aims through the development of environments which encourage healthier day-to-day behaviours and are supported by local services and community networks to sustain health, social and cultural wellbeing. Measures that will help contribute to healthier communities and reduce health inequalities must be incorporated in a development.

For major development[1] proposals, the Council will require a Health Impact Assessment to be submitted, which should include details of implementation and monitoring.  This must provide the information outlined in the template provided at Appendix 4.


[1] Major developments as defined by The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015



There are questions you can answer here, but you must either register or log in first.

vi. Air quality

4.23 Improving local air quality, mitigating the impact of development on air
quality and reducing exposure to poor air quality across Oxford is key to
safeguarding public health and the environment. The whole of the city
was declared an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) in September
2010. Air quality has been identified as having a negative impact upon the
Oxford Meadows SAC. The City Council produced an Air Quality Action
Plan (AQAP) to address the issue of AQMA which suggested a range of
measures that will be required to reduce emissions across Oxford. The AQAP
addresses the integrated approach to air quality and carbon emissions
from road transport. In 2014 a low emissions zone was introduced in the
city centre. In addition, the plan’s support for car free developments and
the promotion of electric vehicles are ways of reducing the high levels of
air pollution across the city and protecting the Oxford Meadows SAC.

4.24 It is important that any negative impacts on air quality from new
development are mitigated and that exposure to poor air quality is
minimised or reduced. Special attention will be given to developments that
are expected to cause traffic increases, and to the type of energy centres/
combustion systems that are expected to be installed on-site.

Policy RE6: Air quality   

Planning permission will only be granted where the impact of new development on air quality is mitigated and where exposure to poor air quality is minimised or reduced.

The exposure of both current and new occupants to air pollution during the development’s operational and construction phases, and the overall negative impact that proposals may cause to the city’s air quality, will be considered in determining planning applications. Where additional negative air quality impacts from a new development are identified, mitigation measures will be required to ameliorate these impacts.

Sensitive uses including residential development, schools and nurseries should be located away from areas of poor air quality, with site layout designed to reduce impact and with any residual impact mitigated through air quality measures.

Planning applications for major proposals (10 or more dwellings or 1000 square metres) which are likely to expose residents to unacceptable levels of air pollution must be accompanied by an Air Quality Assessment (AQA). 

Where the Air Quality Assessment indicates that a development would cause harm to air quality, planning permission will not be granted unless specific measures are proposed and secured to mitigate those impacts.

Planning applications for proposals that involve significant demolition, construction or earthworks will also be required to submit a dust assessment as part of the AQA, to assess the potential impacts and health risks of dust emissions from those activities. Any appropriate site-specific dust mitigation measures will be secured as part of the Construction Management Plan (CMP).

 Further guidance on meeting the requirements of the policy is set out in the Oxford City Council’s Air Quality Planning Application Guidance Note and the up to date IAQM guidelines  which applicants are expected to follow.



There are questions you can answer here, but you must either register or log in first.

vii. Managing the impact of development

4.25 Standards of amenity (the attractiveness of a place) are major factors in
the health and quality of life of all those who live, work and visit Oxford.
Oxford’s constrained nature results in the close proximity of many uses.
This, combined with the railway and major roads (A34 and the Ring Road),
can result in noise, light and air pollution. Policy RE7 seeks to ensure that
standards of amenity are protected.

Policy RE7: Managing the impact of development

Planning permission will only be granted for development that:
a) ensures that the amenity of communities, occupiers and neighbours is protected; and
b) does not have unaddressed transport impacts affecting communities, occupiers, neighbours and the existing transport network; and
c) provides mitigation measures where necessary.

The factors the City Council will consider in determining compliance with the above elements of this policy include:
d) visual privacy, outlook;
e) sunlight, daylight and overshadowing;
f) artificial lighting levels;
g) transport impacts, including the assessment of these impacts within the Transport Assessments, Travel Plans and Delivery and Servicing Management Plans Policy T2;
h) impacts of the construction phase, including the assessment of these impacts within the Construction Management Plans;
i) odour fumes and dust;
j) microclimate;
k) contaminated land; and
l) impact upon water and wastewater infrastructure



There are questions you can answer here, but you must either register or log in first.

viii. Noise and vibration

4.26 Noise and vibration have a significant effect on amenity and people’s
health and wellbeing. The management of noise should be an integral
part of development proposals and considered as early as possible. The
management of noise is about encouraging the right acoustic environment
in the right place at the right time. This is important to promote good health
and a good quality of life within the wider context of achieving sustainable
development. Managing noise includes improving and enhancing the
acoustic environment and promoting appropriate soundscapes. This can
mean allowing some places or certain times to become noisier within
reason, whilst others become quieter.

4.27 Consideration of existing noise sensitivity within an area is important to
minimise potential conflicts of uses or activities. The City Council will seek
to ensure that noise sensitive developments (residential, educational and
health care facilities) are separated from major sources of noise, or that
appropriate attenuation measures are taken. Such attenuation measures
should be included on plans. In cases where noise sensitive development
is proposed in close proximity to an existing noise generating use (e.g.
music venues and pubs) the Council will consider whether the introduction
of the sensitive use might threaten the continued operation of the
existing premises, which might mean the development is inappropriate
in that location. Measures to mitigate the impacts of noise and vibration
associated with demolition and construction will be secured by legal
agreement through Construction Management Plans which form part of
the Transport Assessment.

Policy RE8:  Noise and vibration

Planning permission will only be granted for development proposals which manage noise to safeguard or improve amenity, health, and quality of life.

Planning permission will not be granted for development that will generate unacceptable noise and vibration impacts.

Planning permission will not be granted for development sensitive to noise in locations which experience high levels of noise, unless it can be demonstrated, through a noise assessment, that appropriate attenuation measures will be provided to ensure an acceptable level of amenity for end users and to prevent  harm to the continued operation of existing uses.

Conditions will be used to secure such mitigation measures and operational commitments.  

Measures to mitigate the impacts of noise and vibration associated with demolition and construction will be secured by legal agreement through Construction Management Plans (Refer to Policy T2).



There are questions you can answer here, but you must either register or log in first.

ix. Land quality

4.28 Oxford has a number of closed landfill sites of varying ages, some of
which are still actively producing landfill gas. There are also previously
developed sites that have been contaminated by historic industrial
processes. The presence of contamination can affect or restrict the use of
land but development can address the problem for the benefit of the wider
community and bring the land back into beneficial use.

4.29 Land contamination may be associated with sites previously used for
industry but can also arise from natural sources as well as from human
activities. In assessing whether land contamination is an issue that needs to
be taken into account when a planning application is submitted, the Council
will have regard to a range of information sources including its database
of potentially contaminated sites, information provided by developers
and third parties, and the advice from the Council’s Environmental Health

Policy RE9: Land quality

Planning applications where proposals would be affected by contamination or where contamination may present a risk to the surrounding environment, must be accompanied by a report which:

  1. details the investigations that have been carried out to assess the nature and extent of contamination and the possible impacts it may have on the development and its future users, biodiversity, the natural and built environment; and
  2. sets out detailed mitigation measures to allow the development to go ahead safely and without adverse effect, including, as appropriate:
    (i) removing the contamination;
    (ii) treating the contamination;
    (iii) protecting and/or separating the development from the effects of the contamination;
    (iv) validation of mitigation measures
Where mitigation measures are needed, these will be required as a condition of any planning permission.



There are questions you can answer here, but you must either register or log in first.